I have cut this from the article:

  • However, atheist do recognize that the belief that they need evidence to accept things lacks evidence.

Because it does not seem to make sense. Perhaps the original author could re-word it so that it is clearer? --R Fitzroy 12:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

That person was a christian. They basically are saying that people don't need evidence to believe in something, because there's no evdience confirming that people need evdience to believe in whatever they believe in w/o evdience. (But there is evdience supporting this, making that misinformation.)