Atheism
(Created page with "The '''nebular hypothesis''' states that the Solar System had condensed out of an interstellar nebula that had collapsed, with the planets condensing in orbit around the Sun. Ori...")
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''nebular hypothesis''' states that the Solar System had condensed out of an interstellar nebula that had collapsed, with the planets condensing in orbit around the Sun. Originally proposed by Kant and Laplace in the eighteenth century, it became generally accepted in the 19th century, though a stellar-collision model became popular in the early 20th century. It was revived in the mid 20th century, and it has become generally accepted.
+
The '''nebular hypothesis''' states that the Solar System had condensed out of an interstellar nebula that had collapsed, with the planets condensing in orbit around the Sun. Originally proposed by Kant and Laplace in the 18th century, it became generally accepted in the 19th century, though a stellar-collision model became popular in the early 20th century. It was revived in the mid-20th century, and it has become generally accepted. Naturally this condensation happened over a very long period of time and is inconsistent with [[Young Earth Creationism]].
   
  +
==Evidence==
−
There are several observations that are most consistent with it, like observations of protoplanetary nebulae around various protostars, chemical-composition variations in the Solar System, and cratering rates. The inner planets and asteroids are mostly metal silicates and iron-nickel, materials with high boiling points. Yes, most rocks are metal silicates. But the outer planets' satellites and the comets are mostly water, ammonia, and methane ices, with the outer planets also having a lot of hydrogen and helium. All materials with low boiling points. Also consistent are cratering rates of objects with relatively low geological activity like the Moon and Mars. They have many more craters than can be accounted for by present-day interplanetary-object abundances, and these are reasonably interpreted as the result of the planets sweeping up leftover material.
 
  +
There are several observations that are most consistent with the nebular hypothesis.
  +
* Observations of protoplanetary nebulae around [[Star]]s and protostars.
  +
* Chemical-composition gradients in the Solar System and in Jupiter's Galilean satellites.
  +
** Inner ones: refractory materials like iron-nickel and metal silicates, what most rocks and minerals are made of.
  +
** Outer ones: volatile materials like water, ammonia, and methane ices, and for the outer planets, hydrogen and helium.
  +
* On objects with low geological activity like the Moon and Mars, cratering greatly in excess of extrapolation from present-day cratering rates. This is a consequence of leftover protoplanetary material being swept up.
   
  +
==Complications==
 
However, there are complications like the numerous "hot Jupiters" that have been observed around other stars, some of which have highly-tilted and highly-eccentric orbits. This suggests that giant planets can spiral inward from their formation orbits and have near-collisions with each other as they do so.
 
However, there are complications like the numerous "hot Jupiters" that have been observed around other stars, some of which have highly-tilted and highly-eccentric orbits. This suggests that giant planets can spiral inward from their formation orbits and have near-collisions with each other as they do so.
  +
  +
==See also==
  +
*[[The Bible says the earth is fixed]]
   
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
Line 10: Line 20:
 
* [http://www.nrao.edu/index.php/learnsciencestarandplanetformation Star & Planet Formation]
 
* [http://www.nrao.edu/index.php/learnsciencestarandplanetformation Star & Planet Formation]
 
* [http://www.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/planets03.html extrasolar planets summary 2003] discusses "hot Jupiters" and how they could have formed
 
* [http://www.phy.duke.edu/~kolena/planets03.html extrasolar planets summary 2003] discusses "hot Jupiters" and how they could have formed
  +
[[Category:Astronomy]]
  +
[[Category:Science]]
  +
[[Category:Beacon Library]]

Latest revision as of 17:41, 30 April 2014

The nebular hypothesis states that the Solar System had condensed out of an interstellar nebula that had collapsed, with the planets condensing in orbit around the Sun. Originally proposed by Kant and Laplace in the 18th century, it became generally accepted in the 19th century, though a stellar-collision model became popular in the early 20th century. It was revived in the mid-20th century, and it has become generally accepted. Naturally this condensation happened over a very long period of time and is inconsistent with Young Earth Creationism.

Evidence

There are several observations that are most consistent with the nebular hypothesis.

  • Observations of protoplanetary nebulae around Stars and protostars.
  • Chemical-composition gradients in the Solar System and in Jupiter's Galilean satellites.
    • Inner ones: refractory materials like iron-nickel and metal silicates, what most rocks and minerals are made of.
    • Outer ones: volatile materials like water, ammonia, and methane ices, and for the outer planets, hydrogen and helium.
  • On objects with low geological activity like the Moon and Mars, cratering greatly in excess of extrapolation from present-day cratering rates. This is a consequence of leftover protoplanetary material being swept up.

Complications

However, there are complications like the numerous "hot Jupiters" that have been observed around other stars, some of which have highly-tilted and highly-eccentric orbits. This suggests that giant planets can spiral inward from their formation orbits and have near-collisions with each other as they do so.

See also

External links